ST-Manual Testing - 8 - Defect Reporting
How can we define a defect in
software testing`?
A defect, also known as a bug, is a deviation from the
expected behaviour of a software application. In software testing, a defect is
identified when the actual outcome of a test differs from the expected outcome.
This can occur due to a flaw in the design, coding, or requirements gathering
of the software. Defects can range in severity from minor cosmetic issues to
critical failures that prevent the software from functioning as intended. The
goal of software testing is to identify as many defects as possible before the
software is released to the public, to ensure that the end-users have a
high-quality, reliable experience.
What are all the fields
needed while reporting a defect ?
The fields needed while reporting a defect can vary
depending on the specific organization and its processes, but some common
fields are:
- Summary
or Title: A brief and clear description of the defect.
- Severity:
The level of impact the defect has on the software's functionality.
- Priority:
The urgency with which the defect should be addressed.
- Steps
to Reproduce: Detailed instructions on how to recreate the defect.
- Expected
Result: The behaviour that was expected to occur.
- Actual
Result: The behaviour that occurred.
- Environment:
The specific operating system, hardware, and software configurations under
which the defect was observed.
- Attachments:
Screenshots, log files, or any other relevant information that can assist
in the investigation and resolution of the defect.
- Assigned
To: The individual or team responsible for fixing the defect.
- Status:
The current state of the defect, such as "Open," "In
Progress," "Fixed," or "Closed."
- Resolution:
The explanation of how the defect was fixed or why it cannot be fixed.
These fields help provide a clear and comprehensive
understanding of the issue, making it easier for the development team to
diagnose and resolve the defect. Using the above fields we report a sample
defect in a social networking platform,
Summary or Title: Incorrect display of user profile
picture
Severity: Medium
Priority: High
Steps to Reproduce:
- Log
in to the social networking platform.
- Go
to your profile page.
- Observe
the display of your profile picture.
Expected Result: The profile picture should be
displayed in its correct aspect ratio and size.
Actual Result: The profile picture is displayed with
incorrect dimensions, causing it to appear stretched or compressed.
Environment: Windows 10, Google Chrome version
88.0.4324.104
Attachments: Screenshot of the incorrect display of
the profile picture.
Assigned To: Front-end development team.
Status: Open
Resolution: Not yet determined.
few better to have fields in the above example to provide
more information about the defect:
- Module:
The specific part of the software that is affected by the defect.
- Version:
The version number of the software where the defect was found.
- Date
Found: The date the defect was first identified.
- Reporter:
The person who reported the defect.
- Reproducibility:
The frequency with which the defect occurs, such as "always" or
"random."
- Related
Requirements: The specific requirement or requirements that are
related to the defect.
- Impact:
The extent to which the defect affects the overall functionality of the
software.
- Root
Cause: The underlying cause of the defect, if known.
- Fix
Time Estimate: An estimate of the amount of time required to fix the
defect.
These additional fields can provide valuable context and
help the development team prioritize and plan the resolution of the defect.
What should a test engineer
do when a valid defect is rejected by a developer ?
When a test engineer reports a valid defect that is rejected
by a developer, there are a few steps that can be taken to resolve the issue:
- Verify
the defect: Before taking any further action, the test engineer should
verify that the defect is still present and can be easily reproduced. This
helps to ensure that the defect is not a result of a misunderstanding or
miscommunication.
- Discuss
with the developer: The test engineer should have a discussion with the
developer to understand the reason for the rejection. The developer may
have additional information or a different perspective on the issue that
the test engineer was not aware of. This dialogue can help to resolve any
misunderstandings and come to a mutually agreed upon resolution.
- Provide
additional information: If the developer is unable to reproduce the
defect, the test engineer should provide additional information or
clarification, such as detailed steps to reproduce, screenshots, or log
files. This can help the developer understand the issue better and make a
more informed decision on its validity.
- Escalate
the issue: If the test engineer and the developer are unable to resolve
the issue, the test engineer may need to escalate the matter to a manager
or team lead for further review. This can help to ensure that the defect
is addressed in a timely and effective manner.
- Document
the rejection: Regardless of the outcome, the rejection of the defect
should be documented, along with the reasons for the rejection and any
relevant information or discussions. This helps to maintain a clear record
of the testing process and can assist in future resolution of similar
issues.
By following these steps, the test engineer can work with
the developer to resolve the issue and ensure that valid defects are addressed
and fixed in a timely manner.
What would happen in a defect
triage call?
A defect triage call is a meeting between the test team,
development team, and possibly other stakeholders to review and prioritize
reported defects. The objective of the triage call is to assess the severity
and priority of each defect and determine the next steps for resolution.
During a defect triage call, the following steps typically
occur:
- Review
of reported defects: The test team reviews each defect that has been
reported, including its summary, severity, priority, and any relevant
attachments or additional information.
- Discussion
with development team: The development team provides feedback on the
defects, including their understanding of the issue and their perspective
on its severity and priority.
- Assess
severity and priority: Based on the discussion and review, the group
determines the severity and priority of each defect. This helps to prioritize
the fixing of defects and ensures that the most critical issues are
addressed first.
- Determine
next steps: For each defect, the group determines the next steps,
including who will be responsible for fixing the issue and when it should
be fixed.
- Update
defect tracking system: The information from the triage call is used
to update the defect tracking system, including the status of each defect,
the assigned owner, and the estimated time of resolution.
- Review
open defects: The group reviews the status of open defects and
discusses any issues or concerns related to the resolution of these
defects.
By conducting a regular defect triage call, the test and
development teams can work together to prioritize and resolve reported defects
in an efficient and effective manner.
What is defect age and how it
is elated to defect triage calls !
Defect age refers to the amount of time that has elapsed
since a defect was reported. In software development, the age of a defect is an
important metric that helps to understand the effectiveness of the defect
management process. Defect age can be related to defect triage calls because
the objective of the triage call is to prioritize and resolve reported defects
in a timely manner. During the triage call, the group assesses the severity and
priority of each defect and determines the next steps for resolution. This
helps to ensure that critical defects are fixed as soon as possible and that
the defect management process is effective in addressing reported issues. The
age of a defect is also important because it can impact the cost of resolution.
The longer a defect goes unresolved, the more complex it may become to fix and
the more it may impact the overall quality of the software. By monitoring the
age of defects and conducting regular triage calls, the test and development
teams can work together to prioritize and resolve defects in an efficient and
effective manner, which helps to improve the overall quality of the software.
Please explain defect
severity with an example from a social networking platform app
Defect severity is a classification of how critical a defect
is in relation to the functioning of the software. In a social networking platform
app, for example, the severity of a defect can range from minor cosmetic issues
to critical functionality issues that impact the user experience.
Examples of different levels of defect severity in a social
networking platform app:
- Severity
1: Critical: This is the highest severity level and indicates a defect
that completely prevents the app from functioning or causes a complete
loss of data. For example, a critical defect in a social networking
platform app could be the failure of the login functionality, which
prevents users from accessing their accounts.
- Severity
2: High: This indicates a defect that significantly impacts the
functionality of the app but does not prevent it from functioning
completely. For example, a high severity defect in a social networking
platform app could be a problem with the news feed, which makes it
difficult for users to see updates from their friends.
- Severity
3: Medium: This indicates a defect that has a moderate impact on the
functionality of the app but does not significantly affect the user
experience. For example, a medium severity defect in a social networking
platform app could be a formatting issue with a user's profile page.
- Severity
4: Low: This is the lowest severity level and indicates a defect that
is a cosmetic issue or has a minor impact on the functionality of the app.
For example, a low severity defect in a social networking platform app
could be a misspelled word on a button.
It's important to accurately classify the severity of a
defect so that it can be prioritized and addressed in a timely manner. The more
severe a defect, the higher priority it should be given in the defect
resolution process.
Please explain defect
Priority with an example from a social networking platform app
Defect priority is a classification of how important it is
to fix a defect in relation to other defects and the overall development schedule.
In a social networking platform app, for example, the priority of a defect can
range from minor cosmetic issues that can be fixed later to critical
functionality issues that need to be fixed immediately.
Some examples of different levels of defect priority in a
social networking platform app:
- Priority
1: Urgent: This is the highest priority level and indicates a defect
that must be fixed immediately because it has a major impact on the app's
functionality or is causing significant harm to the user experience. For
example, a priority 1 defect in a social networking platform app could be
a security vulnerability that allows unauthorized access to user data.
- Priority
2: High: This indicates a defect that needs to be fixed as soon as
possible but may not have the same level of urgency as a priority 1
defect. For example, a priority 2 defect in a social networking platform
app could be a problem with the messaging functionality that is causing
delays or errors.
- Priority
3: Medium: This indicates a defect that needs to be fixed at some point
but is not as urgent as a priority 1 or 2 defect. For example, a priority
3 defect in a social networking platform app could be a layout issue with
a specific screen or page.
- Priority
4: Low: This is the lowest priority level and indicates a defect that
can be fixed later or is a minor cosmetic issue. For example, a priority 4
defect in a social networking platform app could be a typo in a piece of
text.
It's important to accurately classify the priority of a
defect so that it can be prioritized and addressed in a timely manner. The
higher the priority of a defect, the more important it is to resolve it quickly
to ensure a high-quality user experience.
Please explain different
defect types based on defect severity and defect priority with one example for
each defect type from a social networking platform app.
Different types of defects based on both severity and
priority in a social networking platform app:
- Critical-Urgent
(Severity 1, Priority 1): A defect that must be fixed immediately
because it has a major impact on the app's functionality and is causing
significant harm to the user experience. For example, a critical-urgent
defect in a social networking platform app could be a security
vulnerability that allows unauthorized access to user data.
- High-Urgent
(Severity 2, Priority 1): A defect that needs to be fixed as soon as
possible because it has a significant impact on the app's functionality
but is not causing immediate harm to the user experience. For example, a
high-urgent defect in a social networking platform app could be a problem
with the messaging functionality that is causing delays or errors.
- Medium-High
(Severity 3, Priority 2): A defect that needs to be fixed soon but is
not as urgent as a priority 1 or 2 defect. For example, a medium-high
defect in a social networking platform app could be a layout issue with a
specific screen or page that affects the overall user experience.
- Low-Medium
(Severity 4, Priority 3): A defect that can be fixed later and is a
minor cosmetic issue. For example, a low-medium defect in a social
networking platform app could be a typo in a piece of text that does not
significantly impact the user experience.
It's important to accurately classify the severity and
priority of a defect so that it can be prioritized and addressed in a timely
manner. The combination of severity and priority determines the overall
importance of fixing a defect, and this information is used to make decisions
about the allocation of resources and the order in which defects are addressed.
Please list out an example
from a social networking platform app for each combination of defect severity
and priority from low to high.
Some examples of different combinations of defect severity
and priority in a social networking platform app:
- Low-Low
(Severity 4, Priority 4): A cosmetic issue that can be fixed at a later
time and has a low impact on the user experience. For example, a low-low
defect in a social networking platform app could be a misaligned button on
a specific screen.
- Medium-Low
(Severity 3, Priority 4): A minor functionality issue that does not
significantly impact the user experience. For example, a medium-low defect
in a social networking platform app could be an error message that appears
in certain circumstances but does not prevent the user from continuing to
use the app.
- Medium-Medium
(Severity 3, Priority 3): A moderate functionality issue that affects the
user experience but can be fixed in a timely manner. For example, a
medium-medium defect in a social networking platform app could be a
problem with the photo upload feature that slows down the app.
- High-Medium
(Severity 2, Priority 3): A significant functionality issue that affects
the user experience and needs to be fixed soon. For example, a high-medium
defect in a social networking platform app could be a problem with the
notification system that causes delays in receiving notifications.
- High-High
(Severity 2, Priority 2): A critical functionality issue that affects the
user experience and needs to be fixed as soon as possible. For example, a
high-high defect in a social networking platform app could be a problem
with the friend-finding feature that prevents users from finding new
friends on the app.
- Critical-High
(Severity 1, Priority 2): A critical issue that has a significant impact
on the user experience and needs to be fixed as soon as possible. For
example, a critical-high defect in a social networking platform app could
be a problem with the privacy settings that causes users' profiles to be
visible to everyone by default.
- Critical-Critical
(Severity 1, Priority 1): A critical issue that has a major impact on the
user experience and must be fixed immediately. For example, a
critical-critical defect in a social networking platform app could be a
security vulnerability that allows unauthorized access to user data.
It's important to note that the classification of defects in
terms of severity and priority can be subjective and may vary from organization
to organization or project to project. However, the overall goal is to
accurately assess the impact of each defect and prioritize them accordingly so
that resources can be effectively allocated, and the most critical defects can
be addressed first.
In a software development cycle, it's essential to have a
well-defined process for reporting, tracking, and fixing defects. This process
typically involves a combination of manual testing, automated testing, and
continuous monitoring of the app's performance and functionality. Defects are
logged, triaged, and then assigned to a development team for resolution.
In conclusion, accurately assessing the severity and
priority of defects is a critical part of software testing and development, as
it helps ensure that resources are effectively allocated and that the most
critical defects are addressed first. Adding
examples for the above for Low - Critical and critical - low
- Low-Critical
(Severity 4, Priority 1): A cosmetic issue that, although it does not
significantly impact the user experience, must be fixed immediately due to
some other factors, such as security or legal requirements. For example, a
low-critical defect in a social networking platform app could be an
incorrect label on a page that misleads users regarding their data
privacy.
- Critical-Low
(Severity 1, Priority 4): A critical functionality issue that, although it
has a significant impact on the user experience, can be fixed later and has
a low priority due to other factors, such as a lack of resources. For
example, a critical-low defect in a social networking platform app could
be a slow loading time for certain pages that affects the user experience
but is not critical to the app's overall functionality.
One more example for the above scenario
- Low-Critical
(Severity 4, Priority 1): A minor typo in the app's user interface that
does not affect the functionality but must be fixed immediately due to the
company's brand image. For example, a low-critical defect in a social
networking platform app could be a misspelling of the company's name on
the login page that needs to be corrected immediately to maintain the
company's brand image.
And another example for the Critical-Low combination:
- Critical-Low
(Severity 1, Priority 4): A critical issue that affects the user
experience but can be temporarily mitigated through workarounds. For
example, a critical-low defect in a social networking platform app could
be a slow performance of the video upload feature, which can be
temporarily mitigated by reducing the video quality before uploading.
Please explain defect life
cycle with the statuses New, Open, Fixed, Closed , rejected , Deferred.
The defect life cycle is the process of tracking and
managing defects from the time they are reported until they are resolved and
closed. The defect life cycle typically includes the following statuses:
- New:
The defect has been reported and is waiting to be reviewed and triaged.
- Open:
The defect has been reviewed and triaged, and a development team is
assigned to address it.
- Fixed:
The development team has addressed the defect and provided a solution, but
it has not yet been verified.
- Closed:
The defect has been verified and found to be resolved, and it is now
closed.
- Rejected:
The defect has been reviewed and determined to not be a valid issue,
either because it is not a defect or because it cannot be fixed.
- Deferred:
The defect has been reviewed and determined to be valid, but it is not a
high-priority issue and will be addressed later.
The goal of the defect life cycle is to ensure that all
defects are tracked, reviewed, and resolved in an efficient and effective
manner. The specific steps and statuses in the defect life cycle may vary
depending on the organization or project, but the overall process helps ensure
that defects are properly managed and resolved, and that communication is clear
between all stakeholders.
what should we do when we
find regression defects ?
When you find regression defects, the following steps can
help address the issue effectively:
- Report
the defect: Report the regression defect as soon as possible, providing
as much detail as possible about the issue, including steps to reproduce
the issue, expected behaviour, and actual behaviour.
- Prioritize
the defect: Determine the severity and priority of the regression
defect, which can help determine the resources and timeline for addressing
the issue.
- Investigate
the cause: Investigate to determine the cause of the regression defect,
including reviewing code changes that may have caused the issue and
determining if the issue was introduced by a new feature or if it is
related to an existing feature.
- Implement
a solution: Develop and implement a solution to address the regression
defect, taking care to ensure that the solution does not introduce new
issues.
- Regression
test: Conduct regression testing to ensure that the solution has
resolved the regression defect and that it has not introduced any new
issues.
- Monitor:
Monitor the application to ensure that the regression defect has not
reoccurred and that the solution is working as expected.
It is important to address regression defects as soon as
possible, as they can significantly impact the functionality and quality of the
software. A comprehensive regression testing strategy can help catch regression
defects early and minimize their impact.
What is defect analysis and
What is most important aspect of a defect analysis?
Defect analysis is the process of reviewing and analysing
defects to determine the root cause and understand the underlying issues that
need to be addressed. The goal of defect analysis is to improve the quality of
the software by identifying areas for improvement and making changes to prevent
similar defects from occurring in the future.
The most important aspect of a defect analysis is accurate
and detailed data collection. This includes information about the defect
itself, such as its description, severity, and priority, as well as data about
the environment in which it was discovered, such as the software version,
hardware configuration, and test conditions. Having accurate and complete data
helps to identify trends, pinpoint areas for improvement, and provide
actionable insights that can be used to improve the software development
process.
Another important aspect of defect analysis is collaboration
between development and testing teams. Defect analysis is often most effective
when both teams work together to determine the root cause and identify areas
for improvement. By sharing information and insights, both teams can gain a
deeper understanding of the software and work together to make improvements
that benefit the overall quality of the product.
How defects can be prevented
There are several steps that can be taken to prevent defects
in software development:
- Requirements
gathering: Accurately defining and documenting the requirements for a
project is the first step in preventing defects. This helps ensure that
the software meets the needs of the stakeholders and reduces the
likelihood of defects due to misunderstandings or miscommunication.
- Code
reviews: Regular code reviews can help identify defects early in the
development process and prevent them from making it into production. Code
reviews also provide an opportunity for developers to learn from one
another and improve their coding skills.
- Test-driven
development: Implementing a test-driven development (TDD) process can
help prevent defects by ensuring that the code is tested before it is
released. This helps to catch defects early in the development process
before they can cause significant issues.
- Automated
testing: Automated testing can help prevent defects by automatically
running tests and detecting any issues. Automated testing is especially
useful for regression testing, which can be time-consuming and difficult
to do manually.
- Continuous
integration and continuous delivery: Implementing a continuous integration
and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline can help prevent defects by
automating the build, test, and release process. This helps to catch
defects early in the development process and reduces the risk of
introducing defects into production.
- Root
cause analysis: Conducting regular root cause analysis to understand
why defects occur and how to prevent them from happening in the future can
be a valuable tool in preventing defects. This helps to identify areas for
improvement and implement changes that prevent similar defects from
occurring in the future.
Preventing defects is a continuous process that requires
ongoing effort and attention. By implementing best practices and continuously
improving the development process, organizations can reduce the number of
defects and improve the overall quality of their software.
What is defect seeding and
how does it help ?
Defect seeding is a technique used to evaluate the
effectiveness of a software testing process by intentionally introducing known
defects into the code and tracking how they are detected and corrected. The
purpose of defect seeding is to measure the efficiency and effectiveness of the
testing process, identify areas for improvement, and help ensure that the
software is thoroughly tested before it is released.
Defect seeding helps in several ways:
- Evaluates
the testing process: Defect seeding provides a way to evaluate the
quality of the testing process and identify areas for improvement. It
helps to determine the effectiveness of the tests, the skill of the
testers, and the quality of the test infrastructure.
- Improves
testing coverage: Defect seeding helps to ensure that the software is
thoroughly tested by forcing the testers to find and correct the known
defects. This helps to increase the coverage of the testing process and
reduces the likelihood of releasing software with undiscovered defects.
- Identifies
weak areas: Defect seeding helps to identify areas of the testing
process that are weak or not well understood. This information can be used
to improve the testing process and prevent similar issues from happening
in the future.
- Enhances
collaboration: Defect seeding can enhance collaboration between the
development and testing teams by encouraging communication and knowledge
sharing. By working together to find and correct the known defects, both
teams can improve their understanding of the software and work together to
improve the overall quality of the product.
Defect seeding should be used with caution, as it has the
potential to introduce new defects into the code. It is important to carefully
plan and manage the defect seeding process to ensure that the benefits are maximized,
and the risks are minimized.
what are the differences
between Defect Containment , defect Cascading , defect seeding and Defect
masking , what are the uses of each of these ?
Defect Containment, Defect Cascading, Defect Seeding, and
Defect Masking are all techniques used in software testing and quality
assurance. They have different goals and uses, as described below:
- Defect
Containment: Defect containment is a technique used to minimize the
impact of defects on the software by controlling their spread and scope.
The goal of defect containment is to prevent the defect from affecting
other parts of the system, reducing the cost and time required to correct
the problem. Defect containment is typically used early in the development
process to identify and correct problems as soon as possible.
- Defect
Cascading: Defect cascading occurs when a single defect causes
multiple problems in the software. The goal of defect cascading is to
identify the root cause of the problem and correct it, preventing further
issues from occurring. Defect cascading is typically used during the
testing phase to identify and correct problems before the software is
released.
- Defect
Seeding: Defect seeding is a technique used to evaluate the
effectiveness of a software testing process by intentionally introducing
known defects into the code and tracking how they are detected and
corrected. The goal of defect seeding is to measure the efficiency and
effectiveness of the testing process, identify areas for improvement, and
help ensure that the software is thoroughly tested before it is released.
- Defect
Masking: Defect masking occurs when a defect in the software is hidden
or disguised by another defect or by a workaround. The goal of defect
masking is to identify the underlying problem and correct it, preventing
further issues from occurring. Defect masking is typically used during the
testing phase to identify and correct problems before the software is
released.
In conclusion, each of these techniques has a different goal
and use case. Defect containment is used to minimize the impact of defects,
defect cascading is used to identify the root cause of problems, defect seeding
is used to evaluate the testing process, and defect masking is used to identify
hidden problems. The choice of which technique to use depends on the specific
needs of the software project and the stage of the development process.
Explaining the same with an appropriate example for each
- Defect
Containment: Defect containment is a technique aimed at limiting the
effect of defects on the software by controlling their spread and scope.
For example, if a defect is discovered in the login module of a social
networking platform app, the defect containment process might involve
fixing the defect in the login module without affecting the other parts of
the app. The goal is to prevent the defect from causing further problems
and to reduce the cost and time required to correct the problem.
- Defect
Cascading: Defect cascading occurs when a single defect results in
multiple issues in the software. For example, if a defect in the password
reset module of a social networking platform app causes the password reset
email to be sent to the wrong email address, this defect might cascade to
cause issues with the user's account and profile. The goal of defect
cascading is to identify the root cause of the problem and correct it,
preventing further issues from occurring.
- Defect
Seeding: Defect seeding is a technique used to assess the quality of
the software testing process by intentionally introducing known defects
into the code and observing how they are detected and corrected. For
example, a tester might seed a social networking platform app with five known
defects and then track how many of those defects are detected and
corrected during the testing process. The goal of defect seeding is to
measure the efficiency and effectiveness of the testing process and to
identify areas for improvement.
- Defect
Masking: Defect masking occurs when a defect in the software is
concealed or disguised by another defect or by a workaround. For example,
if a defect in the notification system of a social networking platform app
is masked by a workaround that hides the notification, the underlying
problem may not be detected. The goal of defect masking is to identify the
hidden problem and correct it, preventing further issues from occurring.
In summary, each of these techniques serves a different
purpose and is used in different stages of the development process. Defect
containment minimizes the impact of defects, defect cascading identifies the
root cause of problems, defect seeding evaluates the testing process, and
defect masking identifies hidden problems. The choice of which technique to use
depends on the specific needs of the software project and the stage of the
development process.
Please explain different defect matrices with the
corresponding formulae ?
There are several defect matrices used in software testing
to evaluate the quality of the software and measure the effectiveness of the
testing process. Here are a few commonly used defect matrices:
- Defect
Density: Defect density is a measure of the number of defects per unit
of software size, typically expressed as defects per 1000 lines of code
(KLOC). The formula for defect density is:
Defect Density = Total Number of Defects / KLOC
- Defect
Removal Efficiency (DRE): Defect Removal Efficiency measures the
percentage of defects found and corrected at each stage of the software
development process. The formula for DRE is:
Defect Removal Efficiency = (Total Number of Defects Found
During Testing) / (Total Number of Defects Found During Testing + Total Number
of Defects Found in Production)
- Defect
Leakage: Defect Leakage measures the percentage of defects that are
not found and corrected during the testing process but are found in
production. The formula for defect leakage is:
Defect Leakage = (Total Number of Defects Found in
Production) / (Total Number of Defects Found During Testing + Total Number of
Defects Found in Production)
- Time-to-Detect
(TTD): Time-to-Detect measures the amount of time it takes to detect a
defect in the software. The formula for TTD is:
Time-to-Detect = (Time the Defect is Introduced) - (Time the
Defect is Detected)
These matrices provide valuable information about the
quality of the software and the effectiveness of the testing process. By using
these matrices, software teams can identify areas for improvement, measure the
impact of changes, and track the progress of the project over time.
A few more defect matrices that are commonly used in
software testing:
- Defect
Fix Rate: Defect Fix Rate measures the rate at which defects are being
fixed by the development team. The formula for Defect Fix Rate is:
Defect Fix Rate = (Total Number of Defects Fixed) / (Total
Number of Defects Found)
- Defect
Escaped Ratio: Defect Escaped Ratio measures the ratio of the number
of defects that were found in production to the number of defects that
were detected during testing. The formula for Defect Escaped Ratio is:
Defect Escaped Ratio = (Total Number of Defects Found in
Production) / (Total Number of Defects Found During Testing)
- Defect
Age: Defect Age measures the amount of time between when a defect was
introduced and when it was detected. The formula for Defect Age is:
Defect Age = (Time the Defect was Detected) - (Time the
Defect was Introduced)
- Mean
Time to Repair (MTTR): Mean Time to Repair measures the average time
it takes to fix a defect once it has been detected. The formula for Mean
Time to Repair is:
Mean Time to Repair = (Total Time to Fix Defects) / (Total
Number of Defects Fixed)
These matrices provide valuable information about the
efficiency of the development process and help software teams prioritize their
efforts and improve the overall quality of their software. By using these
matrices, teams can make data-driven decisions and track their progress over
time.
Which among the above would
be apt to follow in scrum process?
In a Scrum development process, some of the commonly used
defect matrices include Defect Density, Defect Fix Rate, and Mean Time to
Repair (MTTR).
- Defect
Density: This matrix helps the team understand the number of defects
per unit of code and can be used to identify areas where the code is
particularly error prone.
- Defect
Fix Rate: This matrix measures the rate at which defects are being
fixed by the development team and can be used to track progress and
improvement over time.
- Mean
Time to Repair (MTTR): This matrix measures the average time it takes
to fix a defect once it has been detected and can help the team understand
the efficiency of their development process and identify areas for
improvement.
These matrices provide valuable insights into the quality of
the product and the efficiency of the development process. In a Scrum process,
it's important to continuously monitor and improve these metrics to ensure that
the team is delivering high-quality software.
How does version management help
in identifying the defect resolution ?
Version management helps in identifying the defect
resolution by keeping track of the changes made to the software during the
development process. When a defect is reported and resolved, the updated
version of the software is stored in a version management system.
This helps in identifying the root cause of the defect by
comparing the different versions of the software, and it also helps in ensuring
that the same defect does not resurface in future versions. By tracking the
version history, the development team can see the exact changes that were made
to resolve the defect and make sure that these changes do not negatively impact
other parts of the software.
In addition, version management also helps in tracking the
progress of the development team and ensuring that the software is always in a
releasable state. It makes it easier to roll back to a previous version if
necessary and provides a clear record of the evolution of the software over
time.
Overall, version management is a crucial aspect of software
development and it helps in ensuring the quality and stability of the software
by keeping track of the changes made to it and facilitating the resolution of defects.
Comments
Post a Comment